Home
Inanity's Calling Card [entries|archive|friends|userinfo]
rye

[ website | scribblings of insanity ]
[ userinfo | livejournal userinfo ]
[ archive | journal archive ]

more on cats. [Jul. 18th, 2009|12:25 pm]

http://health.msn.com/health-topics/articlepage.aspx?cp-documentid=100241813&gt1=31036
linkpost comment

home dec [Jul. 13th, 2009|08:18 am]
http://www.housebeautiful.com/decorating/home-makeovers/101-makeover-ideas-0209

for future reference
linkpost comment

funniest. commercial. ever. [Jul. 11th, 2009|07:53 am]
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1SmgLtg1Izw

*chokes laughing*
link2 comments|post comment

finances... [Jul. 4th, 2009|02:44 am]
are improving.  owe one person $, one person work, and one person pic editing yet but we're current on the usual monthly expenses now.  paid off the small hospital bill finally but still have the larger one to renegotiate.  no point in doing that until i have enough to pay it off.  getting there tho, a bit at a time. 

do have to get the cats their rabies re-vaccinations and that's going to be a pain - not sure if i should just have my sister go ahead and do it and send the landlord the proof of purchase or what.  suppose i'd best dig out the rules and regulations again but it's going to be a major hassle if i've got to take them to the vet just for a fardling paper when i can get it done for the cost of supplies by my vettech sister.  be $20ish that way, otherwise it's going to be a two hour trip to the cheapest vet.  be rough on shadow, he absolutely loathes cars but with two cats, even factoring in gas, it'll still save money compared to the locals who want an arm and a leg to do something i could do just as well myself with far less stress on them.  not to mention i'd have what i needed to make sure they don't have an unnecessary reaction to the damned vaccine.  (i'm not going to say vaccination is unnecessary but the point of a vaccination is to build antibodies.  who decided those antibodies magically disappear in 365 days?  *snort* the people making money off giving them the shots of course who happen to be the same ones who make money when you have to take them back d/t a nasty reaction to one.  but i'm not going to rant on the topic of the overuse and abuse of vaccines this day.)

at least we're getting our finances back in line.  about bloody time.
link2 comments|post comment

further note on last entry [Jul. 1st, 2009|08:36 pm]
while my sister-in-law has had a hand in shaping my viewpoint on abortion, she's not the only one.  she's just the one that typifies everything i loathe about it.  when i was reading up on abusive relationship dynamics, i crossed stories of women who aborted because, while they were willing to put up with abuse, they didn't want to watch their kids abused or deal with the escalated abuse pregnancy can sometimes trigger.   when cerrik died, i crossed oodles of stories of women mourning for aborted children (most books had at least one chapter dealing with it, along with at least one entire book focused specifically on healing from abortion - which i also read in entirety).  before, in between, and after i've crossed feminist propaganda encouraging women to "take control of their bodies" by aborting rather than raise a family and be "controlled" by men or hormones.  fairly recently, in a completely unrelated lj community i read, a woman was verbally assaulted because her icon advertised the fact she was pregnant and somebody thought she should do her part to save the world from overpopulation by aborting.  (personally, i think that if you're that gungho for protecting the world from overpopulation you should probably set an example by killing yourself first but i'm a bit cynical that way.)

in short, the one thing the stories had in common was that having a baby was "inconvenient" for varying reasons so they opted not to be inconvenienced at the expense of their unborn child's life.  unsurprisingly, most of the life stories printed didn't involve choices made d/t health risks.  given the lower percentage of women actually at risk, i doubt it would sell well if they focused only on that minority.  while some of the stories captured my sympathy - the women WERE in hard places, it still doesn't change the fact their unborn paid with his/her life to make their life easier.

i also suspect, in this world where ppl like to pretend emotions are all evil and logic should triumph, that nobody stops to ask the important questions of themselves or others.  if someone is willing to erase their own flesh and blood from existance in order to convenience themselves, how reliable are they going to be as a friend or s.o.?  can they be trusted to guard your back?  or will they erase you from their life as soon as you become a big enough inconvenience?  are you so much better than their own child that you should expect better treatment when you get close to them?...particularly when that child did nothing to them except exist while you have all sorts of personality flaws that can get to grating on them.

not saying that they'll be that way.  just saying it's not a good indicator.  one i reallly wish my brother had paid attention to.
linkpost comment

Re: Abortion (editted) [Jun. 29th, 2009|06:43 am]
We'll start this entry out with a preface:

Namely, you're welcome to an opinion on this issue but chances are good it's not going to line up with mine.  I can live with that.  I am also aware there are always exceptions.  The problem with exceptions is that THEY ARE NOT THE MAJORITY.  This entry is NOT about exceptions, this is about what I've seen and experienced personally and the conclusions I've drawn therefrom (and the sad reality is that my experience is based pretty much on the standard attitude that comes with a mindset that considers abortion an option they're in the situation and position to take.)

<lj-cut text="lengthy opinion inserted here">Abortion is not simply about choice.  There are a great many things in this world we all have the option to choose, that doesn't mean they aren't bad/wrong/poor choices.  Nor am I a big fan of the "it's my body and I can do whatever the hell I feel like with it" attitude so prevalent nowdays.  A smart person is already aware this is true but also realizes their choices influence everyone around them AND will consider how they are affecting those people so as to accomplish the most amount of good with the least amount of collateral damage. 

I do not have a problem with someone who's had an abortion and learned better from it.  People make mistakes.  There was a woman I worked with I greatly respected both before and after I learned she'd had one in the past. She learned from it, had several other kids, and was still guilting over that child.  (This was secondhand info from her daughter late at night working third shift.  Weird topics come up at 3am.)

I have large issues with people like my sister-in-law who see abortion as an easy way to get out of an inconvenient situation and see nothing wrong with offing several offspring before they're born.

No matter how you slice it, you are stealing more than just someone's life.  In my opinion, this is WORSE than murder - when you murder someone already born, you're only stealing their life.  They had some life, they've made some sort of place in the world and somebody somewhere is going to miss them and in the majority of cases, loved them.  They've made an imprint on the world, for better or worse.  In short, they've lived even if it was briefly.

Someone who's been aborted?  You've not only stolen their life, you've stolen every chance they had to affect the world.  You've stolen every memory they might have made.  You've stolen everyone else's chance to meet that person who might have been and maybe love them.  You've stolen their life AND the memory of them.  They not only didn't get a chance to live, they aren't even allowed the dignity of an existence.*

This is not a matter of logic, this is a matter to be thought over hard with the heart.  A woman choosing to abort is making a unilateral decision that is affecting every person in her life, regardless of whether she chooses to inform them of it.  She is taking something valuable away from the people who know and love her.  It takes two people to make a baby, in cases where the father does want the child she is forcing a decision on him with little to no regard for his feelings in the matter.  In case where the father is uninformed, she's stealing his chance to know his child.  (Yes, there are some exceptions, some people don't have someone who loves them and some guys are abusive jerks who shouldn't be brought into a matter like this.  Once again, EXCEPTIONS.  To be fair, there wouldn't be stereotype if there weren't a goodly portion of guys who push their s.o.'s to abort.  Then again, this wouldn't apply to them anyway so it's a moot point too.)

She is also stealing that child from their grandparents, aunts, uncles, siblings, cousins, and uncountable other lives he/she might have influenced.  That they'll never realize it was missing (barring she isn't stupid enough to leave the doctor's papers under the seat of a car sold to another family member) makes it more horrifying, not less.  Most humans are aware the world will/would have gone on without them if they hadn't been born.  That's not the point.  Consider where your life would be now if EVERY important person in it who influenced you to be who you are had NEVER existed.  I'm not just talking about family here - I'm talking influential teachers, best friends, co-workers who've inspired you to do better, anyone who's impacted you in a positive way and some not so positive ways that taught you what NOT to do.

Just because you can't miss what you never knew could've been doesn't make the loss nonexistent.  It's still there, it just doesn't hurt.  It becomes a matter of 'what if' to contemplate while philosophizing.  It only starts to hurt when you discover somebody really did take those chances away, in the case of my aborted niece/nephew.

Mind you, I don't like little kids/babies in general, for all I was one and nearly had one.  They're loud, obnoxious, and boisterous for the most part.  But those little kids/babies grow up into people and people will change/teach you, for good or ill.  Unless that chance has been taken away by someone who doesn't want to be inconvenienced with the expenses and responsibilities that come with getting yourself pregnant.

...

Dehumanizing a person who hasn't been born yet so you can mitigate the guilt you feel at killing them before you can get to know them takes the same kind of mindset that okays genocides.

Yes, I'm aware people don't like that comparison but seriously, what are the most common excuses used to justify genocides?

1.  The victims aren't "real" people/don't look like "real" people.
2.  They're parasites leeching (financial) resources from "real" people.
3.  They aren't "human" so they don't have "real" feelings.
4.  They represented a (potential) danger to "real" people.

I've heard every one of those excuses applied as "reasons" why abortion should be legal and/or why someone opted for one.  It's prettied up some but it's still the same.

Sorry guys, a shovel may not be a spade but they're similar enough that it doesn't make a difference.  I don't use this for particular emotional shock value, I've done a great deal of research into genocide with special attention paid to the Holocaust and Rwandan massacre because I am part of a minority religion Hitler and other nations at varying times have SPECIFICALLY targeted for extermination.  Jews weren't the only ones.  So while we're talking about what ifs, I am very aware there's a good chance I wouldn't be typing this now had I lived in other countries in other times and I've known this since I was old enough to read.  Our religion routinely posts life stories of members who have lived through those and similar events since in order to prepare us for what we might have to deal with in the future.  I have a very thorough understanding of what propaganda is, how it works, what it accomplishes and what happens when people start "disappearing" and no one speaks up for the voiceless. 

When I hear these same excuses used to justify any version of killing, I take three steps back and start distancing myself from those people trying to justify it.  As far as I'm concerned, abortion is just a new twist on an old mindset.  And you're going to have as much luck changing my mind as if you tried to tell me the Holocaust never happened.

This isn't about logic, it's about empathy.  If I don't want people taking my life away on their whim, I'm not going to support people intentionally doing it to others at any stage of life.


...


Once again, yes, people can make a mistake.  But it's a measure of how they deal with that mistake that shows the kind of person they are.  I am thoroughly anti-abortion, but sometimes a person makes a poor decision without realizing the consequences.  Crap happens.  It would happen less if abortion were harder to get, the emotional aftereffects were covered more in depth, and people would stop advertising it as a simple solution to a minor irritation and recognize it as the pogrom it is.

People who've used it multiple times have no sympathy from me.  Tho I admit this attitude is colored by that particular sister-in-law.  She was a bitch before I knew about that, she's still a bitch now.  She makes the lives of my brother and my niece hell and I cringe every time I have to go over there and listen to the way she talks to them.  Yeah, having an ocd** bitchmom is sucky for my niece but my neice isn't going to be stuck there forever.  She may have issues but at least she'll be given the chance to work through them - something her non-existing older siblings never got.  I'm a big fan of being allowed that chance since I like my life pretty well at this point in time despite my own abusive background.  It's easy enough for a person to end their life at any point in time if they're serious about it, getting it back once somebody else kills you is a little harder.

Yes, people in a high risk pregnancy are different.  And if abortion were only offered to those people you wouldn't be reading this.  Which life to save IS a personal decision they have to weigh out.  But most abortions don't happen for health reasons, they happen for financial, social, and cosmetic reasons which can all be summed up as personal convenience.  A life isn't being saved, somebody is being killed to make someone else's life easier.

Social - zomg i screwed up and i/my parents don't want to tell my parents/friends cuz i'm/they're scared/ashamed so i'll/they'll make it unhappen.

Financial - zomg i'm poor/in school still and i can't afford to pay for/fuck up the rest of my life with more responsibilities.  often used in the case of "fathers" who foresee paying out the nose for the next 18 yrs or by the parents of underage pregnant kids who feel they've already paid their dues and don't want the expense/irritation of another baby in the house.

Cosmetic - zomg, stretch marks!  i'll never be beautiful again!  no guy will ever want me, especially if i have a kid in tow that's not his.  my body is going to get UGLY! and FAT!  i'll be uncomfortable, it'll hurt.  won't be able to go partying or stay out all night cuz i'll have responsibilities!

I'm not denying most of them don't do a lot of soul searching or feel genuine pain at having to make a choice like this.  (I would like to think people like my sister-in-law are a minority.)  But do you really want your life balancing against somebody else's convenience and good judgment, particularly when being in this situation is a good indication their judgment is flawed to start with?  If not, you really shouldn't be arguing for allowing these people to decide for others.  It's called hypocrisy.


Abortions for actual health reasons make up a small percentage of abortion performed and if you make me choose between a few thousand women who will die without an abortion and billions more babies who will be worthlessly sacrificed for the sake of convenience...well, I'll be siding with the billions.  (No, I wouldn't be thinking differently if I were wearing those shoes.  I've already worn a pair similar in style and I took the chance.  He still died but I can live with having made the attempt.  Hanging my life on the line as well just ups the stakes, it doesn't change the game.)
 

Nor does brief overview even begin to cover the emotional shrapnel in cases where the abortion is common knowledge amidst family.  Survivor guilt - yes, I very much suspect this is one of those issues my niece IS going to come face to face with.  The day it comes to a head is a day I am going to be very, very glad not to be standing in my brother's shoes. 


...

On a side note:  The death of the partial birth abortionist doesn't faze me.  I don't condone violence or murder, particularly in church, but my empathy is for his family and the church members who had to witness it.  I have none for him.

 

 

*I'm not a fan of erasing people's entire existances.  It's too similar to what mass murderers are trying to accomplish when they target whole races.  Doing it on an individual level isn't better.

**The problem isn't the undiagnosed ocd.  You can have ocd and not be a bitch.  But if you're a bitch who has ocd it compounds the problem tenfold.  (Bitch being defined as a woman who is actually an insecure little girl attempting to control people with an iron fist, who uses her tongue to eviscerate those around her, has no sense of empathy for those close to her and takes delight in pointing out the worst in everyone in order to feel better about herself.  Yes, it's an insult to dogs everywhere and I probably shouldn't use it.  But it gets the point across...)</lj-cut>


...
For whatever reason, more than likely d/t my brother's laptop, lj is not cutting the entry.  I'll work on it but it may not be fixed until i get home.

link6 comments|post comment

in reply to somebody else's blog... [Jun. 15th, 2009|05:27 am]
[mood | depressed]

Being a cat person, I take issue with a few points here. My cats are at least as personable as any dog I've been privileged to know. In the case of my current cat, possibly more so.
in defense of felines everywhere )
link3 comments|post comment

*twitches* [May. 19th, 2009|06:14 am]
i know somebody out there is going to be taken in by this so i probably shouldn't be amused but c'mon pplz...
... )

if there weren't poor saps out there desperate for a miracle those guys'd be out looking for real jobs instead of spamming my email. i'd be more sympathetic but anybody who's fool enough to think the fbi is operating out of nigeria deserves what they get...particularly when the front page of fbi.gov contains a link to email scams including a few near identical to this one. irony, it's what's for supper!
link3 comments|post comment

amusing things for a change! [May. 18th, 2009|03:52 pm]
http://community.livejournal.com/customers_suck/27462889.html

i love this story. and this community.
linkpost comment

(no subject) [May. 17th, 2009|10:56 am]
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/30762665/?gt1=43001

and this is something dear grandpa did. altho he did wait at least until they were 18ish...assuming hearsay is correct. no, there were absolutely NO skeletons in our family tree, nosirreebob.
link3 comments|post comment

in other things that make me think humans as a group suck [May. 12th, 2009|11:40 am]
http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/AmazingAnimals/story?id=7561260&page=1

wow. who'd've thunk. kids can fit through doggie doors. takes a rocket scientist to figure that out evidently.

if this were a 'get the word out' campaign, i'd have a little sympathy. as it's presented, it just makes me want to puke. i wonder how many of those families the lawyer dug up are going to be offered his "help" in suing the pet door manufacturers in the very near future.

*bonks head on laptop*
link3 comments|post comment

(no subject) [May. 11th, 2009|06:32 am]
"It was awkward. It was so awkward I could have broken the awkward over my knee and made a little awkward city from the tiny awkward pieces." - from Sea of Insanity, a webcomic.

yeah, that may be my new favorite ever quote.
linkpost comment

hrm [May. 10th, 2009|03:07 pm]
whether or not it's a good thing is another story but i've found some of the old songs i used to love on youtube. unsurprisingly, they're mostly depressing.
linkpost comment

(no subject) [May. 7th, 2009|01:14 pm]
currently extremely pissed at husband. that is all.
link2 comments|post comment

filed under things most guys will probably prefer not thinking about [May. 7th, 2009|10:51 am]
[Tags|]

interesting ideas most women might consider ewww at first glance )
link2 comments|post comment

taylor swift - love story [Feb. 22nd, 2009|04:21 pm]
[Tags|]

by all that's right and proper i should detest that song. i've never been particularly fond of shakespeare to start with but i could eventually get into hamlet and macbeth (read on my own time because it felt like i shouldn't tar him for r&j without a second chance). i absolutely loathed romeo and juliet (read in h.s. english) from start to finish. there was nothing appealing about two idiot teenagers lying and tricking their families only to end up killing themselves in the stupidest possible manner in the end. good lord, they didn't EVEN KNOW EACH OTHER and i've never believed in the love at first sight hype. the only thing that can develop that fast is lust and lust is not a stable base to build a sturdy relationship on.

it's not a romantic tragedy, it's idiocy wrapped up in a pretty bow. that being said, it's making me a wee bit twitchy how much i actually liked that song after hearing it a good dozen or so times while helping sara remodel her room.

I got tired of waiting
Wondering if you were ever coming around
My faith in you is fading
When I met you on the outskirts of town, and I said

"Romeo, save me, I've been feeling so alone.
I keep waiting for you but you never come
Is this in my head? I don't know what to think."
He knelt to the ground and pulled out a ring.


right, to start out with the whole expecting a guy to save her from being alone isn't exactly the best recipe for a successful relationship. as they say, it's better to be single and alone than married and miserable. being alone is a state of mind and it's just as easy to be alone if you pick the wrong guy to marry as it is to be alone because no one else is around.

then there's how the song ends on a positive note:

"And said, "Marry me Juliet
You'll never have to be alone
I love you and that's all I really know
I talked to your dad, go pick out a white dress
It's a love story baby just say yes"


ie getting married will solve all your problems and no hint of the fact they both ended up dead. even if this IS a fractured fairytale version in which all lived happily ever after, juliet's parents are still somewhere in the picture and romeo's family isn't going to be all that enthused over their new in-laws either. but hey, it's just a song.

let's not forget the chorus in which she sings, "Romeo take me somewhere we can be alone. I'll be waiting, all there's left to do is run." because running away from your problems makes everything all better and the best thing to do with two hormone crazed teenagers is to let them take off somewhere by themselves...*wince*. yeah, sneaking never solved anything and frequently makes everything worse.

and yet...i still catch myself singing/humming along. *bonks head on desk* i KNOW it's the emotional equivalent of crack and it's reinforcing all the unhealthy relationship angles but i STILL like it.

it's almost as creepy in it's own way as that nick cave song sarghi sent me a long while back - where the wild roses grow. i wonder how many weddings are out there being planned right now with this as "their song." if i were a betting person i'd be wagering on at least 95% of them failing within three years or less.

not to mention the slew of teen age girls out there singing along without the judgment skills necessary to pick the crap out from between the lines...ugh and ugh.
link1 comment|post comment

i know i've been hanging around adam too much when... [Feb. 13th, 2009|09:48 pm]
adam: oh! we're getting our tax return back! you wanna get new glasses???

me: yes, i need new glasses pretty bad.

adam: ...!

me: THE GOGGLES! THEY DO NOTHING!

adam: ...i was about to say that too.



*****************************


adam: what do you think would happen if i jumped on el gato over there?

shadow: *looks at adam* m'row?

adam: how the heck did he know i was talking about him?! when did he learn spanish?
link2 comments|post comment

re: evolution [Feb. 13th, 2009|12:10 am]
the problem with believing life arrived by evolution is that it still doesn't rule out the possibility of godlike beings existing.

because, assuming evolution is true, it's the height of hubris to believe intelligent life ONLY evolved on earth. given that any superior technology comes across as magic to the uninitiated, technologically advanced aliens WILL appear to be gods.

that being the case, who's to say humanity wasn't engineered by aliens so technologically advanced that we're the equivalent of ants in comparison? or that the earth isn't their equivalent of a petri dish?

there's always somebody out there smarter than you (think) you are...

which isn't to say i believe life got here by evolution. ideas are interesting toys tho.
linkpost comment

in other things that make me go *wince* [Jan. 29th, 2009|01:22 pm]
http://www.peta.org/Sea_Kittens/index.asp

i admit my preference in fish is fried but i'm generally fairly open to letting other people spend their money however they feel like. however, cutesifying fish and leaving out pertinant info like THEY EAT THEIR OWN BABIES doesn't particularly open my mind to their cause.

then again, when people/websites present their cause from a two year old's perspective my mind tends to shut pretty quick anyway.
link4 comments|post comment

things to remember when i get home [Jan. 26th, 2009|06:45 am]
[Tags|]

*is madly in love with the theme music to ant bully*

*bookmarks for future reference*
http://www.johndebney.com/debney.php
link1 comment|post comment

navigation
[ viewing | most recent entries ]
[ go | earlier ]

Advertisement